- Published on
A Comparison of Scan to BIM Workflows: Photogrammetry or LIDAR?
- Authors
- Name
- Gretchel Panaga
- about
Singapore has seen a rise in demand for Scan to BIM workflows among project owners. One reason is that Alteration & Addition (A&A) works above 5000sqm now require BIM submissions to the authorities.
Recreating existing assets in BIM can be prohibitively expensive. Fortunately, scanning has become a more cost-effective and time-efficient way to do so. Scan to BIM is now a preferred approach for capturing existing structures, systems, and conditions in a digital format.
Which Method Should I Choose: LiDAR or Photogrammetry?
Feature | LiDAR | Photogrammetry |
---|---|---|
Technology | Laser pulses to measure distances | Photos to reconstruct 3D models |
Accuracy | High – ideal for detailed geometry | Moderate – image-dependent |
Data Output | Point clouds (.e57, .laz, .ptx) | Meshes (.obj, .stl, .3mx) + textures |
Environmental Conditions | Works in low light and cluttered environments | Requires good lighting |
Cost | Higher – uses specialized scanners | Lower – uses standard cameras/drones |
Processing Time | Faster collection, slower cleanup | Slower collection, faster mesh output |
Use Cases | Infrastructure, topography, clash detection | Site context, architectural surveys, heritage scans |
Vegetation Penetration | Can capture through foliage | Limited penetration |
LiDAR generally produces higher accuracy point clouds. It’s better for modeling mechanical systems or verifying structural works. On the other hand, photogrammetry offers a lower-cost, fast turnaround option for creating presentation-ready mesh models or capturing large outdoor sites.
Why Do Engineering Firms Scan Their Existing Assets?
Common use cases for Scan to BIM include:
- Capturing existing site conditions
- Reconstructing missing design documentation
- Verifying as-built models against design intent
- Visualizing buildings in a digital twin platform
In most engineering workflows, LiDAR is preferred due to its precision. However, photogrammetry offers speed and affordability, especially when the goal is to visualize rather than measure.
An Overview of the Scan to BIM Workflow
Step 1: Define the Use Case
The business need drives the data capture method.
- Precision & coordination? Go with LiDAR
- Speed & presentation? Choose photogrammetry
Step 2: Data Capture
For facilities management or asset positioning, a control survey should be conducted. This geo-references the point cloud and ensures it aligns with GIS coordinates.
Sharing design drawings in advance helps surveyors plan:
- Drone flight paths
- Scan segmentation
- Control point locations
This improves accuracy and prevents files from becoming too large to manage.
Step 3: Data Processing
The captured data is:
- Registered to a coordinate system
- Cleaned to remove noise
- Modeled in BIM, especially for elements that cannot be scanned (e.g. concealed MEP)
Step 4: Review and Insights
The point cloud is overlaid on the design BIM for:
- Clash detection
- Deviation analysis
- As-built validation
The final BIM deliverable is typically LOD 300, but clients can request 5D/6D/7D attributes for advanced workflows.
Visualizing Assets with Mesh Models
Mesh models may not offer perfect edge definition, but they’re effective for:
- Stakeholder presentations
- Contextual site reviews
- Web-based visualizations
They can be integrated with BIM and opened using free viewers.
Permitting Considerations for Drone Scans
Some sites in Singapore, like Jurong Island, have restricted airspace. Before flying drones:
- Check for weekday flight caps (e.g. 60m ceiling)
- Maintain 15m minimum clearance from tallest structures
- Seek special permits or clearances
Weekend flights may offer greater flexibility, but always confirm regulations with local authorities before planning a drone survey.
🧠 Conclusion
Scan to BIM is becoming a standard delivery method in the AEC industry due to its efficiency, accuracy, and cost savings.
- Use LiDAR for engineering precision
- Use photogrammetry for quick visual captures
Each method has its strengths. Choosing the right one depends on your project’s scope, regulatory requirements, and intended use of the model.
Frequently Asked Questions
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Which is cheaper, drone or terrestrial scanning | Drones are a more cost-effective option when the area to be scanned is large |
How can I view the final point cloud? | Bentley Viewer is a free software you can use to view point clouds. |
How long does it take to generate the final point-cloud | 1–3 working days |
Can we get structural dimensions from the Point Cloud | Yes |
What is the difference between a point cloud and a mesh model | A mesh model is a 3D representation of an object made up of interconnected polygons, while a point cloud is a collection of individual points that represent the surface of an object or environment. |
When should I use a mesh model over a point cloud? | For Scan-to-BIM, simulations, inspections, and surveying use-cases, a mesh model is preferred. Visually, the 3D textures generated by a mesh model are more appealing and load faster in software due to smaller file sizes. For precision tasks, terrestrial LiDAR is recommended. |